Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, US-based media platforms have made an extraordinary effort to cut off Western audiences from news from a Russian perspective. When social critic Noam Chomsky pointed out how unprecedented this was, NewsweekThe “factchecker” (7/26/22) declared his criticism “clearly false” – a determination that did more to confirm the ideological restrictions of the American media than to debunk them.
Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine in February, Russia todayfunded by the Russian government, was withdrawn from Direc TV and Dish Network (New York Times3/12/22), Youtube (France 2412/03/22), ICT Tac, Meta (CNN03/01/22) Google News (Reuters03/01/22) and Spotify (Reuters3/2/22) in the United States and/or Europe. RT and Sputnik (another Russian state-funded network) were removed from the Apple application store (Tech Crunch03/01/22).
CNN (01/03/22): “The measures taken by television providers and technology companies against RT have…reduced[ed] the Kremlin’s ability to peddle its narrative at a pivotal moment.
Microsoft banned RT from the Windows App Store, and downgraded RT and Sputnik in Bing Search results (Tech Crunch03/01/22). Google (Reuters03/01/22), Meta (Reuters 02/26/22) and Microsoft (Microsoft.com02/28/22) banned RT to receive advertising revenue through their platforms. RT was also banned by Rokua streaming hardware company (CNN03/01/22).
Reasons for banning RT and Sputnik were due to “extraordinary circumstances”, Googlethe words of (Reuters2/26/22), and to protect “against state-sponsored disinformation campaigns” (Microsoft.com02/28/22). RTThe offices of in the United States had to completely stop production (Washington Post3/3/22).
PayPal recently froze independent media accounts such as Consortium news (Democracy now!07/12/22) and MintPress (Democracy now!04/05/22; FAIR.org, 05/18/22). The circumstances surrounding PayPal’s actions are less clear than those of the actions against RT. The editor of Consortium NewsJoe Lauria, said he doesn’t know why PayPal froze his account, but he suspects a clause in the user agreement against “providing false information” may have been invoked (Democracy now!7/12/22).
One of the many chilling effects of the media blackout has been that Youtube deleted all of its archives of comments from Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges (who previously worked for the New York Times and NPR) because it was hosted by RT (Democracy now! 04/01/22).
In May, the United States announced new sanctions against Russian TV channels Channel One Russia, Russia-1 TV Station and NTV broadcasting company (CNN08/05/22), cutting them off from US advertisers.
“A kind of totalitarian culture”
Newsweek (7/26/22): “There are no justified parallels to be drawn between the media landscape of Soviet Russia and that of the United States today.”
Noam Chomsky, professor emeritus of linguistics at MIT and renowned media critic, responded to this consolidated effort to “counter the threat” posed by “information warfare” (Newsweek7/26/22) in an interview with actor Russell Brand (Youtube07/22/22):
Take the United States today; it’s living under a kind of totalitarian culture that never existed in my lifetime, and which is far worse in many ways than the Soviet Union before Gorbachev. Go back to the 1970s, people in Soviet Russia could access BBC, Voice of AmericaGerman television, if they wanted to know the news.
Chomsky’s comments were recently “verified” by Tom Norton of Newsweek (07/26/22). He wrote:
While the BBC and Radio America Free broadcast in Russia after World War II and during the Cold War, their frequencies were jammed by the Soviet government for decades. Any access the Russian public has had has been gained despite, not because of, the efforts of their government.
The article briefly covers the history of signal jamming in the Soviet Union and other comments by Chomsky, concluding:
To suggest that Americans have less access to information than citizens of Soviet Russia is therefore not only clearly false, but an argument that overlooks the sacrifices and perils journalists have endured to provide accurate information about the country, and continue to endure to this day. .
The official decision of Newsweek declared Chomsky’s comments false:
By all accounts, Americans can access news from Russia despite the fact that many Western journalists have fled the country and Russia has blocked its audiences from accessing most social media and news platforms. Westerners.
“A Pervasive Phenomenon”
BBC (23/03/11): “Listening to the [BBC‘s] The Russian Service along with other Western broadcasters had, by the 1970s, become a ubiquitous phenomenon among the Soviet urban intelligentsia.
One of the items used to support the certification of the lie was a New York Times article (05/26/87) from 1987 which reported that “Russia had begun broadcasting Voice of America after blocking its signal for seven years. A BBC The 2011 article (3/23/11) was also used to explain that between 1949 and 1987 the Soviets spent significant funds developing jammers to block Western transmissions.
Interestingly, the same New York Times article reported that “a Harvard University study in the mid-1970s estimated that 28 million people in the Soviet Union listened [to US-funded VoA] at least once a week.'” And likewise, likewise BBC article quoted by Newsweek:
However, jamming has never been fully effective, and listening to the [BBC‘s] The Russian Service along with other Western broadcasters had, by the 1970s, become a ubiquitous phenomenon among the Soviet urban intelligentsia.
Using just two articles from Western sources selected by the fact-checker, it appears that millions of people, including virtually every intellectual in the Soviet Union, accessed and tuned into Western media in the years 1970s, which is quite consistent with Chomsky’s comments: in the 1970s, people in Soviet Russia could access BBC, Voice of AmericaGerman television, if they wanted to know the news.
Newsweek contacted Chomsky for comment, who replied:
I was explicit. I spoke about the prohibition of RT and other channels, comparing it to pre-perestroika Russia when Russians got their news from BBC and VoAaccording to American studies.
A mass Soviet audience
Cold War Broadcasting (CEU Press2010): “Some 52 million people in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe went online every week Voice of America in the early 1980s.”
A collection of studies was published in 2010 in the book, Diffusion of the Cold War: Impact on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europeedited by A. Ross Johnson, former researcher at the Hoover Institute (a conservative think tank) and director of Free Radio Europe (media financed by the United States) and R. Eugene Parta, also former director of RFE and a contributor to the Hoover Institution. Studies support the claim that people in the Soviet Union frequently listened to Western media.
In the 1970s, simulations estimated by MIT put VoA weekly viewership peaking at 19% of the adult Soviet population, with the BBC peaking at 11%. “The results of the study showed that at the end of the 1970s, more than half of the urban population of the USSR more or less regularly listened to foreign broadcasts”, according to Cold War Broadcasting.
Out of curiosity, what do American studies say about the 1980s?
Some 52 million people in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe listen to the Voice of America in the early 1980s. It was about half of VoAthe world audience of the time.
The Soviet war in Afghanistan apparently did not stop people from listening to Western broadcasts. In 1984, 40% of the urban population received information about the war in Afghanistan from Western radio stations, and in 1987 it was 45%.
In the contemporary United States, however, this is not allowed. We cannot have people who listen to the enemy in times of war.
Cold War Broadcasting noted that
the audience size of Western radio stations has steadily increased since broadcasting began in the early post-war period to reach over 50% of the Soviet urban population by the early 1980s.
In other words, Western radios had a massive audience in the former USSR. The number of regular listeners reached 20 to 25%.
Soviet listeners seemed to use their access to information from several angles to get a fuller picture of events:
Despite a relatively high level of trust in Western radio stations, most listeners do not fully accept all the information they hear. The Soviet public took a more deliberate approach to understanding information that was based on a comparison of information obtained from Soviet mass media with that of foreign radio programs.
Thus, Western media and American studies seem to agree with Chomsky: despite the jamming, people had access to and often listened to Western sources in the Soviet Union and were very engaged in current affairs at the time, especially in the 70’s.
ACTION ALERT: You can contact Newsweek here or through Twitter: @Newsweek. Remember that respectful communication is the most effective. Feel free to leave a copy of your message in the comments thread for this article.
FEATURED IMAGE: Noam Chomsky on Democracy now! (07/12/21).
