Ask any journalist today – especially a woman, a person of color, and anyone else from a marginalized community – what it’s like to be an internet journalist and the answer is likely to be exhausting, unpleasant and scary. .
For most, if not all, journalists, having a public online profile is expected or required as part of the job. And while it can be useful for building trust, gaining advice, and building community, it also makes a person more vulnerable to online and potentially offline abuse.
And if journalists need to show off to work, what responsibility do employers have to protect them?
At the UK’s largest news publisher, Reach PLC, the company – which employs 3,000 journalists across nine national newspapers, 110 regional newspapers and 80 online-only sites – has decided assume some of this responsibility. In November, Dr. Rebecca Whittington started out as its very first online security publisher. She is responsible for making the internet a safer place for Reach journalists. and readers.
It is not an easy or straightforward job. I recently sat down with Whittington to talk about what it’s like to be the UK’s first online safety editor, how Reach is currently dealing with online abuse and how it plans to help journalists to feel safer while working. The interview is lightly edited for length and clarity.
Hana’ Tameez: How did you discover this role?
[I found] that journalists recognized the opportunities offered by online tools — but also a lack of understanding, on the part of news outlets and individual journalists, of how to manage the changes that these tools bring about in terms of news production.
For example, if you have social networks and use them to promote your work and interact with online communities, that’s fine. It also means that when you relax in the evening after a day at the office, you receive messages. They can be invasive or abusive and this makes you more vulnerable in some ways, while strengthening your position as a journalist in the community in other ways.
I don’t think I would be in this role without the research skills my PhD gave me. I will apply many of these to gather evidence for Reach and hopefully contribute to some of the amazing research that has already been done in this area.
It’s only the beginning, but I’m already starting to know from the journalists I work with what their personal problems have been, what problems their colleagues have faced and what scope [has already] ended.
Tame:Why does this important work need to be done now?
[Online abuse] is an unfortunate fact of life. The opportunities offered by the Internet have also resulted in obvious disadvantages for people working as public figures or journalists in the online sphere. The UNESCO research group has demonstrated Rise of online hate against women journalists. Really interesting research done at Cardiff University called Hate Labdemonstrates that there is a correlation between online abuse and violence in physical space.
In the UK, the Online security bill is considered. A Member of Parliament was recently stabbed to death and he was receiving threatening messages online. So it’s not just journalism, and it’s not just Reach; it goes in our public spheres and in society as a whole.
How to regulate the online spaces hitherto difficult to regulate? I won’t be able to fix this problem on my own. No one will be able to solve this problem alone. We need to work collaboratively with online platforms, we need to look at accountability within our own networks, and we need to engage others to do the same. I think collaboration will be absolutely key to this because collaborative voices can be heard more strongly.
Tame: What are the most common issues you’ve encountered so far at Reach?
Not everything is as extreme as that in terms of volume or numbers. But we also see journalists, on a daily basis, being told that they are worth rubbish, why shouldn’t they look for another job elsewhere. That kind of thing, being undermined and demoralized on a daily basis. It goes from one extreme to the other.
We have seen hate crimes, racism, threats to life. In these circumstances, we always encourage the victim to report it to the police and we support them in this report.
In a recent case, where very indirect threats were made on a social media platform, it was really unclear where they came from. We ended up involving our security officers in this so that they could support this journalist.
It’s a real variety of things that we see. And I think that’s why it’s such a difficult issue in some ways – we don’t expect anyone to experience or accept any type of abuse, but there is a variety of abuse. Not only that, but there are many different reasons why people to hire in abuse and so we are not going to find a one-size-fits-all solution. We can come up with a series of solutions that will hopefully work together.
Tame: What are some of the challenges you have faced in this role so far?
As part of that, we need to have good systems in place so people can report easily and then we can help them be heard within the organization. Reach has some very good policies and procedures in place, but part of my role will be to make sure they are up to date.
Tame: Where do you see room for improvement in current Reach policies?
[Reach did] a health survey in 2021 that asked journalists about online safety issues. Of the editors who responded, half said they had experienced online abuse. And of that number, 85% said it was in response to something they posted, promoted or shared online. It’s a big challenge, because we have to help our staff to work with confidence in this online space.
The other key element, for me, will be to work with the public who are there for the right reason: because they are engaged, because they are interested in what we produce, because they have a with our products. I think it’s also very important to help them feel safe online. We have people who come into these spaces and do [others] feel in danger. It’s not just our journalists who are offended.